BABO vs. CLIP

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

BABO (YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BABO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. BABO is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past year, BABO returned 5.34% vs 3.84% for CLIP. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BABO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.

Performance

BABO vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABO achieves a -12.44% return, which is significantly lower than CLIP's 2.15% return.

BABO

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 24.54%
• 6M: -17.49%
• YTD: -12.44%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.83%

CLIP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 1.81%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 1Y: 3.84%
• 3Y*: 4.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	$250.76K	$302.64K	$366.64K
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	$40.70M	$30.74M	$37.46M

BABO vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	-12.44%	46.84%	0.65%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	2.15%	4.23%	2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BABO and CLIP is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024	-0.06

Return for Risk

BABO vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BABO

BABO Risk / Return Rank: 13
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 14
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 12

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BABO vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BABO	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	18.01	-17.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	104.81	-104.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	35.28	-34.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	193.09	-192.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.26	1,633.89	-1,633.62

BABO vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABO Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 18.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABO and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BABO vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABO drawdown since its inception was -42.63%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABO and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABO	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.63%	-0.08%	-42.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.63%	-0.02%	-42.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.44%	0.00%	-26.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.40%	0.00%	-15.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.21%	0.00%	+20.21%

Volatility

BABO vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) has a higher volatility of 11.94% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.06%. This indicates that BABO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BABO	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.94%	0.06%	+11.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.82%	0.15%	+24.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.67%	0.21%	+36.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.82%	0.43%	+36.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.82%	0.43%	+36.39%

BABO vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

BABO vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

BABO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.00%, more than CLIP's 3.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	92.00%	85.50%	20.65%	0.00%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.81%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BABO and CLIP in my portfolio?

BABO and CLIP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BABO or CLIP?

BABO has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to CLIP (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABO dropped -42.63% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, BABO or CLIP?

On 1-year performance, BABO leads with 5.34% vs 3.84% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BABO or CLIP?

Over the 1-year period, BABO has performed better with a 5.34% return vs 3.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BABO or CLIP?

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BABO or CLIP?

BABO has the higher dividend yield at 92.00%, compared with 3.81% for CLIP.

What is the main difference between BABO and CLIP?

BABO is categorized as Derivative Income, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABO and 0.07% for CLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.01 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.