PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABA vs. TTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BABA vs. TTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly higher than TTD's -49.21% return.


BABA

1D
0.12%
1M
-14.13%
YTD
-22.32%
6M
-26.87%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
-10.74%
10Y*
4.42%

TTD

1D
2.01%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
-49.21%
6M
-47.39%
1Y
-71.63%
3Y*
-37.11%
5Y*
-20.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABA vs. TTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-22.32%75.80%11.77%-10.83%-25.84%-48.96%9.73%54.74%-20.51%96.37%
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.
-49.21%-67.70%63.33%60.52%-51.08%14.41%208.34%123.83%153.79%65.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BABA and TTD is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2016

0.36

The correlation between BABA and TTD shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BABA:

$272.45B

TTD:

$9.19B

EPS

BABA:

CN¥33.90

TTD:

$0.89

PE Ratio

BABA:

22.55

TTD:

21.71

PEG Ratio

BABA:

1.01

TTD:

0.28

PS Ratio

BABA:

2.26

TTD:

3.16

PB Ratio

BABA:

1.75

TTD:

3.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

BABA:

CN¥811.51B

TTD:

$2.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BABA:

CN¥332.88B

TTD:

$2.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

BABA:

CN¥112.44B

TTD:

$725.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABA vs. TTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TTD
TTD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTD Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABA vs. TTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BABATTDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.71

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

-0.92

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

-1.28

+1.16

BABA vs. TTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABA Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the TTD Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABA and TTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BABA vs. TTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, smaller than the maximum TTD drawdown of -86.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and TTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABATTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.09%

-86.45%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.94%

-78.94%

+39.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.94%

-86.45%

+46.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.48%

-86.45%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.20%

-86.18%

+23.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.56%

-27.27%

-10.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.58%

56.84%

-37.26%

Volatility

BABA vs. TTD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is 10.07%, while The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) has a volatility of 18.89%. This indicates that BABA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABATTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

18.89%

-8.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.24%

41.21%

-11.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.83%

64.24%

-20.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.40%

67.34%

-15.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.40%

68.43%

-25.03%

Dividends

BABA vs. TTD - Dividend Comparison

BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while TTD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.93%1.36%1.96%1.29%
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BABA vs. TTD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and The Trade Desk, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B20222023202420252026
35.15B
688.86M
(BABA) Total Revenue
(TTD) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BABA values in CNY, TTD values in USD

BABA vs. TTD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and The Trade Desk, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
33.4%
73.6%
Portfolio components
BABA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

TTD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported a gross profit of 506.89M and revenue of 688.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.

BABA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

TTD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported an operating income of 66.65M and revenue of 688.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

BABA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

TTD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported a net income of 40.00M and revenue of 688.86M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BABA and TTD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTD has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to BABA (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs TTD's -86.45%.

BABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABA and TTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer