BABA vs. FLTR.L
BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) and FLTR.L (Flutter Entertainment plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — BABA in Internet Retail, FLTR.L in Gambling. Over the past 5 years, BABA returned -10.74%/yr vs -11.25%/yr for FLTR.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BABA vs. FLTR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BABA is traded in USD, while FLTR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FLTR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR.L's -50.23% return.
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
FLTR.L
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- 15.96%
- YTD
- -50.23%
- 6M
- -51.59%
- 1Y
- -59.55%
- 3Y*
- -18.42%
- 5Y*
- -11.25%
- 10Y*
- —
BABA vs. FLTR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 36.84% |
FLTR.L Flutter Entertainment plc | -50.23% | -16.28% | 46.16% | 29.99% | -14.26% | -22.88% | 74.41% | 72.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and FLTR.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2019 | 0.24 |
The correlation between BABA and FLTR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BABA:
$272.45B
FLTR.L:
£14.27B
BABA:
CN¥33.90
FLTR.L:
-$4.14
BABA:
2.26
FLTR.L:
0.81
BABA:
1.75
FLTR.L:
2.12
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
FLTR.L:
$23.82B
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
FLTR.L:
$7.40B
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
FLTR.L:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. FLTR.L — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
FLTR.L
BABA vs. FLTR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABA | FLTR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.70 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | -0.86 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | -1.41 | +1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABA vs. FLTR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than FLTR.L's maximum drawdown of -69.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and FLTR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | FLTR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -69.81% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -69.81% | +29.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.94% | -69.81% | +29.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -69.81% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.20% | -64.92% | +2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.56% | -21.51% | -16.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.58% | 42.42% | -22.84% |
Volatility
BABA vs. FLTR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is 10.07%, while Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) has a volatility of 12.72%. This indicates that BABA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | FLTR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 12.72% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.24% | 34.43% | -5.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.83% | 42.04% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 39.57% | +11.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 40.39% | +3.01% |
Dividends
BABA vs. FLTR.L - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while FLTR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLTR.L Flutter Entertainment plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% |
Financials
BABA vs. FLTR.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Flutter Entertainment plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BABA vs. FLTR.L - Profitability Comparison
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
FLTR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment plc reported a gross profit of 2.11B and revenue of 12.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
FLTR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment plc reported an operating income of 258.00M and revenue of 12.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
FLTR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flutter Entertainment plc reported a net income of -334.62M and revenue of 12.18B, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BABA and FLTR.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BABA and FLTR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer