BABA vs. CD
BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) and CD (Chaince Digital Holdings Inc) are both stocks. BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while CD operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, BABA returned 4.42%/yr vs -25.35%/yr for CD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BABA vs. CD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than CD's -4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has outperformed CD with an annualized return of 4.42%, while CD has yielded a comparatively lower -25.35% annualized return.
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -21.91%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- -2.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
CD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -23.01%
- YTD
- -4.43%
- 6M
- -33.94%
- 1Y
- 15.85%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- -7.87%
- 10Y*
- -25.35%
BABA vs. CD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
CD Chaince Digital Holdings Inc | -4.43% | -27.23% | 162.69% | 109.41% | -64.75% | 3.93% | 85.98% | 17.14% | -93.14% | -72.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and CD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2015 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
BABA:
CN¥33.90
CD:
-$0.23
BABA:
2.26
CD:
180.39
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
CD:
$1.67M
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
CD:
-$1.10M
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
CD:
-$10.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. CD — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
CD
BABA vs. CD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABA | CD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.21 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 0.18 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 0.24 | -0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABA vs. CD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, smaller than the maximum CD drawdown of -99.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and CD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | CD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -99.79% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -89.83% | +49.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.94% | -89.83% | +49.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -92.40% | +19.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | -99.58% | +19.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.20% | -98.22% | +36.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.56% | -90.00% | +52.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.58% | 67.26% | -47.68% |
Volatility
BABA vs. CD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is 10.07%, while Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) has a volatility of 57.07%. This indicates that BABA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | CD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 57.07% | -47.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.24% | 106.07% | -76.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.83% | 187.20% | -143.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 151.80% | -100.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 146.04% | -102.64% |
Dividends
BABA vs. CD - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, while CD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
CD Chaince Digital Holdings Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BABA vs. CD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BABA and CD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CD has higher volatility (57.07%) compared to BABA (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs CD's -99.79%.
CD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABA and CD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer