BABA vs. CCL
BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) and CCL (Carnival Corporation & Plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — BABA in Internet Retail, CCL in Travel Services. Over the past 10 years, BABA returned 4.42%/yr vs -3.28%/yr for CCL. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BABA vs. CCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than CCL's -3.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has outperformed CCL with an annualized return of 4.42%, while CCL has yielded a comparatively lower -3.28% annualized return.
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -14.13%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
CCL
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- 19.15%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.29%
- 10Y*
- -3.28%
BABA vs. CCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | -3.42% | 22.55% | 34.41% | 130.02% | -59.94% | -7.11% | -56.89% | 7.37% | -23.40% | 30.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and CCL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
BABA:
$272.45B
CCL:
$40.62B
BABA:
CN¥33.90
CCL:
$2.21
BABA:
22.55
CCL:
13.18
BABA:
2.26
CCL:
1.51
BABA:
1.75
CCL:
3.12
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
CCL:
$26.98B
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
CCL:
$10.13B
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
CCL:
$7.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. CCL — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
CCL
BABA vs. CCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABA | CCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.13 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 0.86 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 1.73 | -1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABA vs. CCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, smaller than the maximum CCL drawdown of -90.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and CCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | CCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -90.37% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -29.30% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.94% | -42.85% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -78.21% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | -90.37% | +10.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.20% | -55.46% | -6.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.56% | -28.58% | -8.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.58% | 14.54% | +5.04% |
Volatility
BABA vs. CCL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is 10.07%, while Carnival Corporation & Plc (CCL) has a volatility of 16.53%. This indicates that BABA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | CCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 16.53% | -6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.24% | 39.11% | -9.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.83% | 47.77% | -3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 55.59% | -4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 57.65% | -14.25% |
Dividends
BABA vs. CCL - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than CCL's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCL Carnival Corporation & Plc | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 3.93% | 3.96% | 2.41% | 2.59% | 2.02% |
Financials
BABA vs. CCL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Carnival Corporation & Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BABA vs. CCL - Profitability Comparison
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
CCL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported a gross profit of 2.23B and revenue of 6.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.1%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
CCL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported an operating income of 607.00M and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
CCL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carnival Corporation & Plc reported a net income of 258.00M and revenue of 6.17B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BABA and CCL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCL has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to BABA (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs CCL's -90.37%.
CCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABA and CCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer