BABA vs. AVGO
BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) and AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) are both stocks. BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while AVGO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BABA returned 4.42%/yr vs 40.96%/yr for AVGO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BABA vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's 10.62% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 4.42%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 40.96% annualized return.
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -21.91%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- -2.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
AVGO
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 50.41%
- 3Y*
- 67.17%
- 5Y*
- 55.09%
- 10Y*
- 40.96%
BABA vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 10.62% | 50.63% | 110.49% | 104.18% | -13.27% | 56.48% | 44.88% | 29.05% | 2.18% | 48.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and AVGO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.33 |
The correlation between BABA and AVGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BABA:
$272.45B
AVGO:
$1.86T
BABA:
CN¥33.90
AVGO:
$6.01
BABA:
22.55
AVGO:
63.58
BABA:
1.01
AVGO:
0.79
BABA:
2.26
AVGO:
24.70
BABA:
1.75
AVGO:
21.24
BABA:
CN¥811.51B
AVGO:
$75.47B
BABA:
CN¥332.88B
AVGO:
$50.53B
BABA:
CN¥112.44B
AVGO:
$41.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
AVGO
BABA vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABA | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.22 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 1.77 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 4.11 | -4.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABA vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and AVGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -48.30% | -31.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -28.67% | -11.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.94% | -41.15% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -41.15% | -31.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | -48.30% | -31.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.20% | -20.66% | -41.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.56% | -7.98% | -29.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.58% | 12.30% | +7.28% |
Volatility
BABA vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is 10.07%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 20.53%. This indicates that BABA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 20.53% | -10.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.24% | 35.04% | -5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.83% | 45.57% | -1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 43.39% | +8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 39.52% | +3.88% |
Dividends
BABA vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than AVGO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.65% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BABA vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BABA vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
AVGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
AVGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
AVGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BABA and AVGO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGO has higher volatility (20.53%) compared to BABA (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABA dropped -80.09% vs AVGO's -48.30%.
AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BABA and AVGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer