BABA vs. 1093.HK
BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) and 1093.HK (CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd) are both stocks. BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while 1093.HK operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, BABA returned 4.42%/yr vs 17.60%/yr for 1093.HK. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BABA vs. 1093.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BABA is traded in USD, while 1093.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1093.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -22.32% return, which is significantly lower than 1093.HK's -14.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has underperformed 1093.HK with an annualized return of 4.42%, while 1093.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 17.60% annualized return.
BABA
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -21.91%
- YTD
- -22.32%
- 6M
- -26.87%
- 1Y
- -2.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- -10.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
1093.HK
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- -14.70%
- 6M
- -6.09%
- 1Y
- -18.63%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- -7.74%
- 10Y*
- 17.60%
BABA vs. 1093.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -22.32% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
1093.HK CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd | -14.70% | 81.07% | -30.62% | -7.78% | -0.87% | 7.97% | 62.29% | 69.64% | -27.68% | 93.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and 1093.HK is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2014 | 0.21 |
The correlation between BABA and 1093.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. 1093.HK — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
1093.HK
BABA vs. 1093.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd (1093.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABA | 1093.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.97 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | -0.49 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | -0.88 | +0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABA vs. 1093.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than 1093.HK's maximum drawdown of -74.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and 1093.HK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | 1093.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -74.75% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -38.76% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.94% | -38.76% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -60.80% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | -61.22% | -18.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.20% | -36.31% | -25.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.56% | -26.99% | -10.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.58% | 21.40% | -1.82% |
Volatility
BABA vs. 1093.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is 10.07%, while CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd (1093.HK) has a volatility of 13.42%. This indicates that BABA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1093.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | 1093.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.07% | 13.42% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.24% | 35.29% | -6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.83% | 50.50% | -6.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 44.77% | +6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 47.12% | -3.72% |
Dividends
BABA vs. 1093.HK - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than 1093.HK's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1093.HK CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd | 1.93% | 2.85% | 6.28% | 3.44% | 2.44% | 2.01% | 1.79% | 1.86% | 2.55% | 1.46% | 2.55% | 2.43% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 0.93% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BABA vs. 1093.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BABA and 1093.HK have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BABA and 1093.HK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer