PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAB vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAB vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAB achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BAB has underperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 2.24%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.08% annualized return.


BAB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.12%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
-0.38%
10Y*
2.24%

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAB vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAB
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
0.12%8.30%1.03%8.67%-19.50%1.00%9.11%10.85%0.93%9.87%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BAB and SPHD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012

-0.00

The correlation between BAB and SPHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAB vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAB
BAB Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAB vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BABSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.13

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.11

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

2.78

+2.15

BAB vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAB and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.74

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.39

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.40

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.58

-0.06

Drawdowns

BAB vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAB drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.80%

-41.39%

+13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.15%

-7.33%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.57%

-13.29%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.95%

-19.50%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.80%

-41.39%

+13.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-5.37%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-4.70%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.93%

-1.47%

Volatility

BAB vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) is 1.72%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that BAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

2.99%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.78%

7.55%

-3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.80%

11.04%

-5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

14.16%

-5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.69%

17.64%

-7.95%

BAB vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAB has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAB vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

BAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAB
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
4.10%3.96%3.97%3.65%3.40%2.63%2.96%3.77%4.20%3.96%4.26%4.71%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAB and SPHD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHD has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to BAB (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAB dropped -27.80% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, SPHD leads with 7.08% vs 2.24% for BAB. On fees, BAB is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, BAB has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 7.08% return vs 2.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BAB is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 4.10% for BAB.

BAB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SPHD is Dividend. BAB tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Build America Bond Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for BAB and 0.30% for SPHD.

BAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAB and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer