B vs. FLRN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

B (Barrick Mining Corporation) is a stock, while FLRN (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). Over the past 10 years, B returned 10.50%/yr vs 3.03%/yr for FLRN. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

B vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrick Mining Corporation (B) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, B achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, B has outperformed FLRN with an annualized return of 10.50%, while FLRN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.03% annualized return.

B

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: 10.98%
• YTD: -0.50%
• 6M: 5.92%
• 1Y: 117.32%
• 3Y*: 38.67%
• 5Y*: 15.52%
• 10Y*: 10.50%

FLRN

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: 2.15%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: 5.58%
• 5Y*: 4.19%
• 10Y*: 3.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

B vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
B Barrick Mining Corporation	-0.50%	186.91%	-12.29%	7.86%	-6.81%	-14.75%	24.60%	38.45%	-5.01%	-8.80%
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	1.84%	5.01%	6.32%	6.54%	1.31%	0.39%	0.77%	4.02%	1.39%	1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between B and FLRN is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011	0.06

The correlation between B and FLRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

B vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

B

B Risk / Return Rank: 89
B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
B Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
B Omega Ratio Rank: 88
B Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
B Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FLRN

FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

B vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Mining Corporation (B) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	B	FLRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	7.12	-4.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	13.04	-10.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	3.38	-1.98
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	21.39	-17.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.21	128.97	-118.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

B vs. FLRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current B Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is lower than the FLRN Sharpe Ratio of 7.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of B and FLRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	B	FLRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	7.12	-4.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	2.49	-2.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.72	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.50	-0.31

Drawdowns

B vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum B drawdown since its inception was -88.51%, which is greater than FLRN's maximum drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for B and FLRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	B	FLRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.51%	-14.64%	-73.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.31%	-0.23%	-29.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.31%	-1.43%	-27.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.96%	-2.16%	-45.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.13%	-14.64%	-42.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.21%	-0.03%	-18.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.29%	-1.83%	-35.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.53%	0.04%	+11.49%

Volatility

B vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison

Barrick Mining Corporation (B) has a higher volatility of 16.45% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.16%. This indicates that B's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	B	FLRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.45%	0.16%	+16.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.61%	0.53%	+33.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.02%	0.68%	+43.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.97%	1.69%	+34.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.71%	4.20%	+32.51%

Dividends

B vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

B's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than FLRN's 4.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
B Barrick Mining Corporation	2.15%	1.21%	2.58%	2.21%	3.20%	2.47%	1.82%	0.70%	1.40%	0.83%	0.50%	1.90%
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.51%	4.89%	5.67%	5.68%	1.95%	0.39%	1.22%	2.76%	2.39%	1.64%	1.06%	0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both B and FLRN in my portfolio?

B and FLRN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, B or FLRN?

B has higher volatility (16.45%) compared to FLRN (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, B dropped -88.51% vs FLRN's -14.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.12 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.