PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZZ vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AZZ vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AZZ Inc. (AZZ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AZZ having a 41.68% return and CHAT slightly higher at 42.01%.


AZZ

1D
0.45%
1M
-1.48%
6M
23.24%
YTD
41.68%
1Y
38.72%
3Y*
52.79%
5Y*
25.59%
10Y*
10.71%

CHAT

1D
-5.30%
1M
-12.49%
6M
36.21%
YTD
42.01%
1Y
73.94%
3Y*
41.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZZ vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AZZ
AZZ Inc.
41.68%31.89%42.35%60.75%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
42.01%49.85%30.98%21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AZZ and CHAT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZZ vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZZ
AZZ Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZZ vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AZZ Inc. (AZZ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AZZCHATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.80

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.61

11.13

-6.52

AZZ vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZZ and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AZZ vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZZ drawdown since its inception was -77.87%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZZ and CHAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZZCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.87%

-31.34%

-46.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.16%

-19.54%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-31.34%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.48%

-19.54%

+14.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.90%

-5.52%

-26.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

6.67%

+1.75%

Volatility

AZZ vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AZZ Inc. (AZZ) is 11.88%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.90%. This indicates that AZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZZCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.88%

16.90%

-5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.92%

32.39%

-7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.73%

37.11%

-5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.57%

31.83%

+1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.77%

31.83%

+3.94%

Dividends

AZZ vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

AZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than CHAT's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZZ
AZZ Inc.
0.56%0.69%0.83%1.17%1.69%1.23%1.43%1.48%1.68%1.33%0.97%1.08%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
2.01%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AZZ and CHAT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAT has higher volatility (16.90%) compared to AZZ (11.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZZ dropped -77.87% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZZ and CHAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer