AZTD vs. IMFL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AZTD (Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF) and IMFL (Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - AZTD tracks the Solactive Aztlan Global Developed Markets SMID Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross while IMFL tracks the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AZTD returned 17.68%/yr vs 17.64%/yr for IMFL. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AZTD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for IMFL.

Performance

AZTD vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZTD achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly lower than IMFL's 17.17% return.

AZTD

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 13.87%
• 6M: 15.86%
• 1Y: 25.47%
• 3Y*: 17.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMFL

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 3.38%
• YTD: 17.17%
• 6M: 20.62%
• 1Y: 31.35%
• 3Y*: 17.64%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZTD vs. IMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF	13.87%	25.46%	6.87%	10.34%	-1.54%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	17.17%	30.89%	-3.57%	25.51%	1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between AZTD and IMFL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022	0.75

The correlation between AZTD and IMFL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

AZTD vs. IMFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AZTD	IMFL
Technology	25.3%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	22.3%	7.5%
Industrials	18.2%	17.4%
Financial Services	14.4%	11.0%
Healthcare	7.8%	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	11.6%
Basic Materials	3.0%	5.5%
Utilities	2.0%	3.9%
Communication Services	1.6%	3.6%
Energy	1.4%	5.9%
Real Estate	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

AZTD vs. IMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZTD

AZTD Risk / Return Rank: 44
AZTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AZTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
AZTD Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AZTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AZTD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

IMFL

IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 58
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZTD vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AZTD	IMFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.01	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.75	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.36	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	2.67	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	9.46	-1.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AZTD vs. IMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the IMFL Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZTD and IMFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AZTD	IMFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	2.01	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.62	+0.16

Drawdowns

AZTD vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZTD drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, smaller than the maximum IMFL drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTD and IMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AZTD	IMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.75%	-33.26%	+16.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.19%	-11.77%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.75%	-13.52%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-0.89%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.87%	-7.24%	+3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	3.32%	+0.05%

Volatility

AZTD vs. IMFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) is 5.06%, while Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that AZTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AZTD	IMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.06%	5.57%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	13.08%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.35%	15.69%	+1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.55%	16.05%	+2.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.55%	15.98%	+2.57%

AZTD vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZTD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

AZTD vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison

AZTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than IMFL's 2.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF	0.92%	1.05%	1.87%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	2.88%	2.88%	3.56%	3.85%	3.35%	3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AZTD and IMFL in my portfolio?

AZTD and IMFL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AZTD or IMFL?

IMFL has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to AZTD (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZTD dropped -16.75% vs IMFL's -33.26%.

Which ETF is better, AZTD or IMFL?

On 3-year performance, AZTD leads with 17.68% vs 17.64% for IMFL. On fees, IMFL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, AZTD has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AZTD or IMFL?

Over the 3-year period, AZTD has performed better with a 17.68% return vs 17.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AZTD or IMFL?

IMFL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AZTD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AZTD or IMFL?

IMFL has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.92% for AZTD.

What is the main difference between AZTD and IMFL?

AZTD tracks Solactive Aztlan Global Developed Markets SMID Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IMFL tracks FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AZTD and 0.34% for IMFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.