AZTD vs. IMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL).
AZTD and IMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AZTD is a passively managed fund by Aztlan that tracks the performance of the Solactive Aztlan Global Developed Markets SMID Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Aug 17, 2022. IMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. Both AZTD and IMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AZTD vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AZTD vs. IMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF | 3.25% | 25.46% | 6.87% | 10.34% | -1.54% |
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 8.63% | 30.89% | -3.57% | 25.51% | 1.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZTD achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly lower than IMFL's 8.63% return.
AZTD
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 28.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMFL
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -5.40%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AZTD vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AZTD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AZTD vs. IMFL — Risk / Return Rank
AZTD
IMFL
AZTD vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZTD | IMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 2.09 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 2.71 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.39 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.96 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 11.45 | -2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZTD | IMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 2.09 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.54 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between AZTD and IMFL is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AZTD vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison
AZTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than IMFL's 3.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF | 1.02% | 1.05% | 1.87% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 3.11% | 2.88% | 3.56% | 3.85% | 3.35% | 3.94% |
Drawdowns
AZTD vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZTD drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, smaller than the maximum IMFL drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTD and IMFL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZTD | IMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.75% | -33.26% | +16.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -11.77% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.28% | -7.51% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -7.37% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.04% | +0.40% |
Volatility
AZTD vs. IMFL - Volatility Comparison
Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) have volatilities of 7.57% and 7.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AZTD | IMFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.57% | 7.34% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 11.89% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.67% | 16.63% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 15.90% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 15.87% | +2.68% |