PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZO vs. RNMBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AZO vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZO achieves a -8.11% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -23.17% return. Over the past 10 years, AZO has underperformed RNMBY with an annualized return of 15.33%, while RNMBY has yielded a comparatively higher 38.75% annualized return.


AZO

1D
1.13%
1M
-7.44%
YTD
-8.11%
6M
-9.56%
1Y
-15.40%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
17.45%
10Y*
15.33%

RNMBY

1D
-2.52%
1M
7.27%
YTD
-23.17%
6M
-26.34%
1Y
-30.47%
3Y*
74.63%
5Y*
70.20%
10Y*
38.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZO vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
-8.11%5.92%23.84%4.84%17.64%76.84%-0.49%42.10%17.85%-9.93%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
-23.17%190.28%99.83%63.35%122.00%-13.84%-2.03%28.14%-29.38%98.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AZO and RNMBY is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2012

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AZO:

$52.52B

RNMBY:

$64.85B

EPS

AZO:

$145.27

RNMBY:

€3.56

PE Ratio

AZO:

21.45

RNMBY:

67.40

PEG Ratio

AZO:

1.86

RNMBY:

3.08

PS Ratio

AZO:

2.66

RNMBY:

5.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

AZO:

$19.99B

RNMBY:

€9.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AZO:

$10.34B

RNMBY:

€4.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

AZO:

$4.26B

RNMBY:

€1.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZO vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZO
AZO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AZO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AZO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

RNMBY
RNMBY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RNMBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNMBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNMBY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RNMBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNMBY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZO vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AZORNMBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.91

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

-0.69

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

-1.50

+0.50

AZO vs. RNMBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZO Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is comparable to the RNMBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZO and RNMBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AZO vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZO drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, smaller than the maximum RNMBY drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZO and RNMBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZORNMBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.32%

-67.75%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.59%

-44.06%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.59%

-44.06%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-44.06%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.14%

-67.75%

+25.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.44%

-40.00%

+11.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-16.73%

+5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.50%

20.36%

-4.86%

Volatility

AZO vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison

AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) have volatilities of 11.64% and 12.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZORNMBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.64%

12.05%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.75%

33.85%

-12.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.23%

45.65%

-18.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.46%

44.78%

-20.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.48%

41.51%

-15.03%

Dividends

AZO vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison

AZO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNMBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
0.98%0.49%0.96%1.46%1.82%1.72%1.56%1.36%1.47%2.06%2.97%0.53%

Financials

AZO vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AutoZone, Inc. and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
4.84B
1.97B
(AZO) Total Revenue
(RNMBY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AZO values in USD, RNMBY values in EUR

AZO vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AutoZone, Inc. and Rheinmetall AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
52.2%
21.9%
Portfolio components
AZO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.52B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

RNMBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

AZO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported an operating income of 923.76M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.

RNMBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

AZO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a net income of 641.49M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.

RNMBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AZO and RNMBY have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNMBY has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to AZO (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZO dropped -46.32% vs RNMBY's -67.75%.

AZO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZO and RNMBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer