AZNIX vs. PGWCX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

AZNIX (Virtus Income & Growth Fund) and PGWCX (Virtus Focused Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - AZNIX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Allianz, while PGWCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Allianz. Over the past 10 years, AZNIX returned 9.51%/yr vs 18.45%/yr for PGWCX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AZNIX charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for PGWCX.

Performance

AZNIX vs. PGWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Income & Growth Fund (AZNIX) and Virtus Focused Growth Fund (PGWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZNIX achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than PGWCX's 5.67% return. Over the past 10 years, AZNIX has underperformed PGWCX with an annualized return of 9.51%, while PGWCX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.45% annualized return.

AZNIX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 10.09%
• 6M: 9.77%
• 1Y: 20.64%
• 3Y*: 14.52%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

PGWCX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 5.67%
• 6M: 5.32%
• 1Y: 22.37%
• 3Y*: 30.28%
• 5Y*: 16.59%
• 10Y*: 18.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZNIX vs. PGWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AZNIX Virtus Income & Growth Fund	10.09%	11.97%	11.24%	18.99%	-19.58%	11.81%	23.37%	20.81%	-5.56%	13.05%
PGWCX Virtus Focused Growth Fund	5.67%	19.31%	52.99%	52.26%	-34.89%	19.61%	47.57%	32.96%	-6.82%	30.45%

Correlation

The correlation between AZNIX and PGWCX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007	0.91

The correlation between AZNIX and PGWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AZNIX vs. PGWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZNIX

AZNIX Risk / Return Rank: 74
AZNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
AZNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
AZNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
AZNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
AZNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

PGWCX

PGWCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
PGWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PGWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PGWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
PGWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PGWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZNIX vs. PGWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Income & Growth Fund (AZNIX) and Virtus Focused Growth Fund (PGWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AZNIX	PGWCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	1.37	+1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	1.94	+1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.24	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	1.38	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.34	5.02	+11.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AZNIX vs. PGWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZNIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the PGWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZNIX and PGWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AZNIX	PGWCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	1.37	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.63	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.76	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.62	+0.01

Drawdowns

AZNIX vs. PGWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZNIX drawdown since its inception was -45.11%, smaller than the maximum PGWCX drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZNIX and PGWCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AZNIX	PGWCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.11%	-67.19%	+22.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.16%	-16.31%	+10.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.59%	-30.02%	+19.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.92%	-39.09%	+15.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.24%	-39.09%	+12.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-2.21%	+1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-17.87%	+11.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	4.46%	-3.21%

Volatility

AZNIX vs. PGWCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Income & Growth Fund (AZNIX) is 2.76%, while Virtus Focused Growth Fund (PGWCX) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that AZNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AZNIX	PGWCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	4.44%	-1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.16%	12.70%	-5.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.67%	16.39%	-7.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.73%	26.55%	-15.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.39%	24.45%	-13.06%

AZNIX vs. PGWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZNIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than PGWCX's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

AZNIX vs. PGWCX - Dividend Comparison

AZNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than PGWCX's 13.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AZNIX Virtus Income & Growth Fund	6.54%	7.00%	7.29%	7.49%	8.26%	6.21%	6.59%	8.18%	7.22%	7.82%	8.94%	9.33%
PGWCX Virtus Focused Growth Fund	13.13%	13.87%	24.05%	6.02%	15.19%	41.55%	15.72%	23.03%	20.78%	1.92%	3.51%	9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AZNIX and PGWCX in my portfolio?

AZNIX and PGWCX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AZNIX or PGWCX?

PGWCX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to AZNIX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZNIX dropped -45.11% vs PGWCX's -67.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AZNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.