PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGWCX vs. AZMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGWCX vs. AZMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Focused Growth Fund (PGWCX) and Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Fund (AZMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGWCX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than AZMIX's 25.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PGWCX has outperformed AZMIX with an annualized return of 18.63%, while AZMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.06% annualized return.


PGWCX

1D
-0.93%
1M
6.39%
YTD
7.05%
6M
7.18%
1Y
24.72%
3Y*
30.83%
5Y*
17.20%
10Y*
18.63%

AZMIX

1D
1.66%
1M
8.25%
YTD
25.54%
6M
27.77%
1Y
51.65%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
9.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGWCX vs. AZMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGWCX
Virtus Focused Growth Fund
7.05%19.31%52.99%52.26%-34.89%19.61%47.57%32.96%-6.82%30.45%
AZMIX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Fund
25.54%33.20%0.98%7.15%-27.76%2.53%22.61%21.90%-19.63%36.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PGWCX and AZMIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2012

0.56

The correlation between PGWCX and AZMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGWCX vs. AZMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGWCX
PGWCX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PGWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PGWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AZMIX
AZMIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AZMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AZMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGWCX vs. AZMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Focused Growth Fund (PGWCX) and Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Fund (AZMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGWCXAZMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

2.82

-1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

3.54

-1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.52

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

4.13

-2.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.77

13.97

-8.19

PGWCX vs. AZMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGWCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the AZMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGWCX and AZMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGWCXAZMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.82

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.23

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.49

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.38

+0.25

Drawdowns

PGWCX vs. AZMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGWCX drawdown since its inception was -67.19%, which is greater than AZMIX's maximum drawdown of -44.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGWCX and AZMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGWCXAZMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.19%

-44.57%

-22.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-12.58%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.02%

-17.91%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.09%

-43.05%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.09%

-44.57%

+5.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

0.00%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.87%

-14.25%

-3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

3.71%

+0.74%

Volatility

PGWCX vs. AZMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Focused Growth Fund (PGWCX) is 4.08%, while Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Fund (AZMIX) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that PGWCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AZMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGWCXAZMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

6.75%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

14.99%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

18.47%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.55%

19.46%

+7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.45%

18.42%

+6.03%

PGWCX vs. AZMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGWCX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AZMIX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGWCX vs. AZMIX - Dividend Comparison

PGWCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.96%, more than AZMIX's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZMIX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Fund
2.51%3.15%1.57%1.80%2.08%0.57%1.68%2.96%3.07%1.70%2.41%3.62%
PGWCX
Virtus Focused Growth Fund
12.96%13.87%24.05%6.02%15.19%41.55%15.72%23.03%20.78%1.92%3.51%9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGWCX and AZMIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AZMIX has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to PGWCX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGWCX dropped -67.19% vs AZMIX's -44.57%.

AZMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGWCX and AZMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer