PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZN vs. VCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AZN vs. VCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZN achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than VCR's -0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, AZN has outperformed VCR with an annualized return of 15.97%, while VCR has yielded a comparatively lower 13.76% annualized return.


AZN

1D
-1.94%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
1.57%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
15.97%

VCR

1D
0.20%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZN vs. VCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
-0.75%43.30%-0.62%1.44%19.14%19.66%3.12%35.68%13.86%33.10%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
-0.09%5.77%24.27%40.38%-35.15%24.86%48.36%27.45%-2.31%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AZN and VCR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.34

The correlation between AZN and VCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (5 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZN vs. VCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZN
AZN Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZN vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AZNVCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

0.72

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

2.21

+1.62

AZN vs. VCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the VCR Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZN and VCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AZN vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZN drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, smaller than the maximum VCR drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZN and VCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZNVCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-61.54%

+12.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.43%

-15.59%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.87%

-27.36%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.87%

-39.20%

+11.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.87%

-39.20%

+11.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.25%

-4.64%

-9.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-9.39%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

5.05%

+0.94%

Volatility

AZN vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison

AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) at 6.17%. This indicates that AZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZNVCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

6.17%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.74%

13.48%

+4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.76%

18.62%

+7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.03%

24.03%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.93%

22.43%

+2.50%

Dividends

AZN vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison

AZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than VCR's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
2.98%1.70%2.27%2.15%2.12%2.35%2.80%2.81%3.69%3.95%5.01%4.06%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.73%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


AZN and VCR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AZN has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to VCR (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZN dropped -48.94% vs VCR's -61.54%.

AZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZN and VCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer