PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZN vs. BSMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AZN vs. BSMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZN achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than BSMR's 1.04% return.


AZN

1D
-0.66%
1M
-3.91%
YTD
-2.12%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
14.81%

BSMR

1D
0.05%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.31%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZN vs. BSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
-2.12%43.30%-0.62%1.44%19.14%19.66%3.12%9.65%
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
1.04%3.10%1.51%4.47%-7.60%1.09%4.97%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AZN and BSMR is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZN vs. BSMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZN
AZN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZN Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMR
BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZN vs. BSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AZNBSMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.74

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

7.37

-5.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.70

23.41

-18.71

AZN vs. BSMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZN Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the BSMR Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZN and BSMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AZNBSMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

3.33

-2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.16

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.22

+0.27

Drawdowns

AZN vs. BSMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZN drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, which is greater than BSMR's maximum drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZN and BSMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZNBSMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-13.49%

-35.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.43%

-0.57%

-14.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.87%

-3.50%

-24.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.87%

-12.02%

-15.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.43%

0.00%

-15.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-3.49%

-7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

0.18%

+5.42%

Volatility

AZN vs. BSMR - Volatility Comparison

AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) at 0.34%. This indicates that AZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZNBSMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

0.34%

+6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.06%

0.92%

+16.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.18%

1.25%

+23.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.94%

3.03%

+20.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.90%

5.72%

+19.18%

Dividends

AZN vs. BSMR - Dividend Comparison

AZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than BSMR's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
3.02%1.70%2.27%2.15%2.12%2.35%2.80%2.81%3.69%3.95%5.01%4.06%
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
2.72%2.77%2.78%2.72%1.40%1.00%1.49%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AZN and BSMR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AZN has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to BSMR (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZN dropped -48.94% vs BSMR's -13.49%.

BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZN and BSMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer