AZBIX vs. PGWCX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

AZBIX (Virtus Small-Cap Fund) and PGWCX (Virtus Focused Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - AZBIX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Allianz, while PGWCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Allianz. Over the past 10 years, AZBIX returned 11.78%/yr vs 18.45%/yr for PGWCX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AZBIX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for PGWCX.

Performance

AZBIX vs. PGWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX) and Virtus Focused Growth Fund (PGWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZBIX achieves a 18.35% return, which is significantly higher than PGWCX's 5.67% return. Over the past 10 years, AZBIX has underperformed PGWCX with an annualized return of 11.78%, while PGWCX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.45% annualized return.

AZBIX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 18.35%
• 6M: 17.88%
• 1Y: 34.08%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: 8.26%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

PGWCX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 5.67%
• 6M: 5.32%
• 1Y: 22.37%
• 3Y*: 30.28%
• 5Y*: 16.59%
• 10Y*: 18.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZBIX vs. PGWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AZBIX Virtus Small-Cap Fund	18.35%	8.49%	19.06%	14.09%	-18.04%	18.92%	16.98%	24.13%	-9.25%	21.27%
PGWCX Virtus Focused Growth Fund	5.67%	19.31%	52.99%	52.26%	-34.89%	19.61%	47.57%	32.96%	-6.82%	30.45%

Correlation

The correlation between AZBIX and PGWCX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2013	0.75

The correlation between AZBIX and PGWCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AZBIX vs. PGWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZBIX

AZBIX Risk / Return Rank: 60
AZBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
AZBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
AZBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
AZBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AZBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

PGWCX

PGWCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
PGWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PGWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PGWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
PGWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PGWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZBIX vs. PGWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX) and Virtus Focused Growth Fund (PGWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AZBIX	PGWCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.37	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	1.94	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.24	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	1.38	+2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	5.02	+7.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AZBIX vs. PGWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the PGWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZBIX and PGWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AZBIX	PGWCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	1.37	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.63	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.76	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.62	-0.07

Drawdowns

AZBIX vs. PGWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZBIX drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, smaller than the maximum PGWCX drawdown of -67.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZBIX and PGWCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AZBIX	PGWCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.80%	-67.19%	+26.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-16.31%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.01%	-30.02%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.85%	-39.09%	+9.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.80%	-39.09%	-1.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.21%	+2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.71%	-17.87%	+10.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	4.46%	-1.80%

Volatility

AZBIX vs. PGWCX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Small-Cap Fund (AZBIX) and Virtus Focused Growth Fund (PGWCX) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AZBIX	PGWCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	4.44%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.20%	12.70%	-0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.71%	16.39%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.50%	26.55%	-6.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.35%	24.45%	-3.10%

AZBIX vs. PGWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZBIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than PGWCX's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

AZBIX vs. PGWCX - Dividend Comparison

AZBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than PGWCX's 13.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AZBIX Virtus Small-Cap Fund	4.14%	4.90%	10.82%	2.31%	4.78%	13.82%	0.45%	0.38%	9.62%	13.80%	0.03%	3.59%
PGWCX Virtus Focused Growth Fund	13.13%	13.87%	24.05%	6.02%	15.19%	41.55%	15.72%	23.03%	20.78%	1.92%	3.51%	9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AZBIX and PGWCX in my portfolio?

AZBIX and PGWCX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AZBIX or PGWCX?

AZBIX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to PGWCX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZBIX dropped -40.80% vs PGWCX's -67.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AZBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.