PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AYEW.DE vs. CHPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AYEW.DE vs. CHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AYEW.DE) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AYEW.DE is traded in EUR, while CHPX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHPX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AYEW.DE achieves a 24.61% return, which is significantly lower than CHPX's 96.27% return.


AYEW.DE

1D
-1.67%
1M
15.12%
YTD
24.61%
6M
23.38%
1Y
45.27%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
21.48%
10Y*

CHPX

1D
-2.95%
1M
26.73%
YTD
96.27%
6M
91.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AYEW.DE vs. CHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AYEW.DE and CHPX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AYEW.DE vs. CHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AYEW.DE
AYEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AYEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AYEW.DE vs. CHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AYEW.DE) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AYEW.DECHPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

AYEW.DE vs. CHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AYEW.DECHPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

5.23

-4.22

Drawdowns

AYEW.DE vs. CHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AYEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, which is greater than CHPX's maximum drawdown of -14.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AYEW.DE and CHPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AYEW.DECHPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.36%

-14.30%

-17.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-2.95%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-3.55%

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

Volatility

AYEW.DE vs. CHPX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AYEW.DECHPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.98%

37.51%

-17.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

37.51%

-14.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.48%

37.51%

-14.03%

AYEW.DE vs. CHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AYEW.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AYEW.DE vs. CHPX - Dividend Comparison

AYEW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than CHPX's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AYEW.DE
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.46%0.82%0.40%0.65%0.12%
CHPX
Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF
0.03%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AYEW.DE and CHPX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AYEW.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AYEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CHPX.

AYEW.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPX is Semiconductors. AYEW.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while CHPX tracks Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AYEW.DE and 0.50% for CHPX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AYEW.DE and CHPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer