AXUP vs. LULG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AXUP (T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AXUP charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.

Performance

AXUP vs. LULG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF (AXUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AXUP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LULG

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -6.81%
• YTD: -68.07%
• 6M: -59.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXUP vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AXUP T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF	-34.20%	-24.41%
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF	-68.07%	47.31%

Correlation

The correlation between AXUP and LULG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

AXUP vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF (AXUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AXUP	LULG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.86	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AXUP	LULG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-73.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-70.43%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AXUP	LULG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	85.71%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	85.71%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	85.71%	—

AXUP vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AXUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AXUP vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison

Neither AXUP nor LULG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AXUP and LULG in my portfolio?

AXUP and LULG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AXUP or LULG?

On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AXUP or LULG?

LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AXUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AXUP or LULG?

AXUP and LULG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AXUP and LULG?

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AXUP and 0.75% for LULG.