AXQT.DE vs. EEAU.DE

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AXQT.DE (AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc) and EEAU.DE (BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation) are both exchange-traded funds - AXQT.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned, while EEAU.DE is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by BNP Paribas. AXQT.DE is passively managed, while EEAU.DE is actively managed. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AXQT.DE charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EEAU.DE.

Performance

AXQT.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (EEAU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AXQT.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.86%
• 6M: 22.59%
• YTD: 35.23%
• 1Y: 54.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 47.93%

EEAU.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.46%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AXQT.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc	€0.00	€6.33K	€6.72K
EEAU.DE BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation	€20.25K	€19.11K	€17.01K

AXQT.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AXQT.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc	-5.02%
EEAU.DE BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AXQT.DE and EEAU.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2026	0.31

Return for Risk

AXQT.DE vs. EEAU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AXQT.DE

AXQT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 90
AXQT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AXQT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AXQT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AXQT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AXQT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EEAU.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AXQT.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy - Managed Futures UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (EEAU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AXQT.DE	EEAU.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.77	—	—

Drawdowns

AXQT.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.81%, which is greater than EEAU.DE's maximum drawdown of -2.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXQT.DE and EEAU.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AXQT.DE	EEAU.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.81%	-2.42%	-11.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.16%	-2.42%	-7.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.60%	-0.56%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AXQT.DE	EEAU.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.26%	11.94%	+10.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.02%	11.94%	+10.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.02%	11.94%	+10.08%

AXQT.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AXQT.DE has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than EEAU.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AXQT.DE vs. EEAU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AXQT.DE nor EEAU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AXQT.DE and EEAU.DE in my portfolio?

AXQT.DE and EEAU.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AXQT.DE or EEAU.DE?

On fees, AXQT.DE is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AXQT.DE or EEAU.DE?

AXQT.DE is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EEAU.DE.

What is the main difference between AXQT.DE and EEAU.DE?

AXQT.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEAU.DE is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: AXA IM and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AXQT.DE and 0.60% for EEAU.DE.