AXQT.DE vs. SADM.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AXQT.DE (AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc) and SADM.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - AXQT.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned while SADM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AXQT.DE returned 69.43% vs 28.74% for SADM.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AXQT.DE charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for SADM.DE.

Performance

AXQT.DE vs. SADM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AXQT.DE achieves a 40.98% return, which is significantly higher than SADM.DE's 13.18% return.

AXQT.DE

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 7.44%
• YTD: 40.98%
• 6M: 44.68%
• 1Y: 69.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SADM.DE

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 13.18%
• 6M: 13.48%
• 1Y: 28.74%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 4.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXQT.DE vs. SADM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AXQT.DE AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc	40.98%	15.03%
SADM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF	13.18%	14.12%

Correlation

The correlation between AXQT.DE and SADM.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025	0.78

The correlation between AXQT.DE and SADM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AXQT.DE vs. SADM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AXQT.DE

AXQT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 93
AXQT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AXQT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AXQT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AXQT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AXQT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SADM.DE

SADM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 53
SADM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SADM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SADM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SADM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SADM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AXQT.DE vs. SADM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AXQT.DE	SADM.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.62	1.69	+1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.47	2.43	+2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.29	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.01	3.04	+2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.04	9.77	+12.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AXQT.DE vs. SADM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AXQT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the SADM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AXQT.DE and SADM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AXQT.DE	SADM.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.62	1.69	+1.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.20	0.50	+1.71

Drawdowns

AXQT.DE vs. SADM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.65%, smaller than the maximum SADM.DE drawdown of -27.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXQT.DE and SADM.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AXQT.DE	SADM.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.65%	-27.30%	+8.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.49%	-9.42%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.23%	-3.17%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.07%	-11.37%	+8.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	2.93%	+0.21%

Volatility

AXQT.DE vs. SADM.DE - Volatility Comparison

AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF USD Acc (AXQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE) at 5.86%. This indicates that AXQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SADM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AXQT.DE	SADM.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.70%	5.86%	+2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.43%	13.63%	+2.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.11%	16.94%	+2.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.01%	16.88%	+3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.01%	16.97%	+3.04%

AXQT.DE vs. SADM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AXQT.DE has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SADM.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AXQT.DE vs. SADM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AXQT.DE nor SADM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AXQT.DE and SADM.DE in my portfolio?

AXQT.DE and SADM.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AXQT.DE or SADM.DE?

On fees, SADM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AXQT.DE or SADM.DE?

SADM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AXQT.DE.

What is the main difference between AXQT.DE and SADM.DE?

AXQT.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned, while SADM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: AXA IM and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AXQT.DE and 0.18% for SADM.DE.