PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AXPG vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AXPG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF (AXPG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AXPG

1D
-6.55%
1M
-12.36%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
9.00%
1M
30.35%
YTD
562.84%
6M
362.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXPG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AXPG and LINT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AXPG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF (AXPG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AXPG vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AXPGLINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.12

24.05

-25.16

Drawdowns

AXPG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXPG drawdown since its inception was -30.54%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXPG and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AXPGLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.54%

-49.54%

+19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.58%

-26.55%

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.05%

-20.51%

-0.54%

Volatility

AXPG vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AXPGLINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.05%

163.04%

-102.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.05%

163.04%

-102.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.05%

163.04%

-102.99%

AXPG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AXPG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

AXPG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

AXPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AXPG and LINT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AXPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AXPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for AXPG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AXPG and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AXPG and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer