AXPG vs. CELT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AXPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF) and CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AXPG is passively managed, while CELT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. AXPG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CELT.

Performance

AXPG vs. CELT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF (AXPG) and Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AXPG

• 1D: -6.55%
• 1M: -12.36%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXPG vs. CELT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AXPG Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF	-26.97%
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	-10.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AXPG and CELT is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026	-0.00

Return for Risk

AXPG vs. CELT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF (AXPG) and Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AXPG	CELT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.12	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AXPG	CELT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.58%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AXPG	CELT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.05%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.05%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.05%	—	—

AXPG vs. CELT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AXPG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CELT's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

AXPG vs. CELT - Dividend Comparison

Neither AXPG nor CELT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AXPG and CELT in my portfolio?

AXPG and CELT have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AXPG or CELT?

On fees, AXPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AXPG or CELT?

AXPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AXPG or CELT?

AXPG and CELT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AXPG and CELT?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AXPG and 1.30% for CELT.