AWWIX vs. FHLFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AWWIX (CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, AWWIX returned 5.73%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for FHLFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AWWIX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.

Performance

AWWIX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWWIX achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly lower than FHLFX's 9.53% return.

AWWIX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 4.02%
• 6M: 4.91%
• 1Y: 11.91%
• 3Y*: 12.84%
• 5Y*: 5.73%
• 10Y*: —

FHLFX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 22.51%
• 3Y*: 17.18%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWWIX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AWWIX CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund	4.02%	26.10%	5.39%	15.31%	-14.12%	2.01%	17.03%	9.68%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	9.53%	31.96%	3.67%	18.16%	-14.17%	11.23%	8.09%	9.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AWWIX and FHLFX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019	0.93

The correlation between AWWIX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AWWIX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWWIX

AWWIX Risk / Return Rank: 10
AWWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
AWWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
AWWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
AWWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
AWWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FHLFX

FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWWIX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AWWIX	FHLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	1.47	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	2.10	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.27	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	1.91	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.23	7.17	-3.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AWWIX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWWIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWWIX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AWWIX	FHLFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	1.47	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.56	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.53	-0.06

Drawdowns

AWWIX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWWIX drawdown since its inception was -32.98%, roughly equal to the maximum FHLFX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWWIX and FHLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AWWIX	FHLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.98%	-33.58%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.25%	-11.37%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.78%	-13.62%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.35%	-29.36%	-0.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.50%	-0.42%	-2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.74%	-6.11%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	3.03%	+0.57%

Volatility

AWWIX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) is 4.36%, while Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that AWWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AWWIX	FHLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	4.64%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.25%	12.08%	+0.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.28%	14.83%	+0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.02%	15.98%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.82%	17.64%	+1.18%

AWWIX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWWIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

AWWIX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

AWWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AWWIX CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund	0.70%	0.73%	1.14%	1.16%	1.53%	1.97%	0.26%	0.11%	0.00%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	3.16%	3.46%	2.98%	2.86%	2.60%	2.47%	1.92%	1.95%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AWWIX and FHLFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, AWWIX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AWWIX or FHLFX?

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to AWWIX (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWWIX dropped -32.98% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.