PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWWIX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWWIX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWWIX achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.11% return.


AWWIX

1D
0.24%
1M
2.36%
YTD
4.89%
6M
4.29%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
13.09%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*

VEA

1D
-3.07%
1M
0.11%
YTD
13.11%
6M
12.98%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWWIX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AWWIX
CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund
4.89%26.10%5.39%15.31%-14.12%2.01%17.03%9.68%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.11%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%10.13%

Correlation

The correlation between AWWIX and VEA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.93

The correlation between AWWIX and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWWIX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWWIX
AWWIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AWWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AWWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWWIX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AWWIXVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.33

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.62

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

10.06

-5.83

AWWIX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWWIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWWIX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AWWIX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWWIX drawdown since its inception was -32.98%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWWIX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWWIXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.98%

-60.68%

+27.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-11.63%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.78%

-13.45%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-29.71%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-3.07%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-13.26%

+6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

3.02%

+0.65%

Volatility

AWWIX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund (AWWIX) is 4.81%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that AWWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWWIXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

7.09%

-2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.90%

14.74%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

16.79%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

16.76%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

17.21%

+1.61%

AWWIX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWWIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWWIX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

AWWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than VEA's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWWIX
CIBC Atlas International Growth Fund
0.69%0.73%1.14%1.16%1.53%1.97%0.26%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.58%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, AWWIX and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to AWWIX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWWIX dropped -32.98% vs VEA's -60.68%.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWWIX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer