AWSAX vs. CSUAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AWSAX (Invesco Global Core Equity Fund) and CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AWSAX returned 8.50%/yr vs 7.38%/yr for CSUAX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.22% expense ratio.

Performance

AWSAX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Core Equity Fund (AWSAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWSAX achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, AWSAX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 8.50%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.38% annualized return.

AWSAX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 7.53%
• 6M: 7.81%
• 1Y: 17.78%
• 3Y*: 16.68%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 8.50%

CSUAX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: 9.47%
• 6M: 8.83%
• 1Y: 16.20%
• 3Y*: 11.76%
• 5Y*: 6.74%
• 10Y*: 7.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWSAX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AWSAX Invesco Global Core Equity Fund	7.53%	15.33%	16.49%	21.79%	-22.22%	15.71%	7.29%	24.54%	-15.01%	22.83%
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	9.47%	14.30%	8.30%	2.09%	-5.20%	16.24%	-1.65%	24.26%	-5.83%	17.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AWSAX and CSUAX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2004	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between AWSAX and CSUAX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AWSAX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWSAX

AWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 27
AWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
AWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
AWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
AWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
AWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CSUAX

CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 40
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWSAX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Core Equity Fund (AWSAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AWSAX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.70	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.47	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.30	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	2.75	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.71	9.19	-1.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AWSAX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWSAX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AWSAX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	1.70	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.52	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.50	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.55	-0.20

Drawdowns

AWSAX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWSAX drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWSAX and CSUAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AWSAX	CSUAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.00%	-52.20%	-4.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.11%	-5.99%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.74%	-14.95%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.23%	-20.45%	-10.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.12%	-35.05%	-1.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-3.39%	+3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.61%	-8.44%	-2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	1.79%	+0.57%

Volatility

AWSAX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund (AWSAX) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.14%. This indicates that AWSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AWSAX	CSUAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.14%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.86%	7.82%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	9.68%	+2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.77%	12.99%	+2.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	14.92%	+2.22%

AWSAX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AWSAX and CSUAX have an expense ratio of 1.22%.

Dividends

AWSAX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

AWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, more than CSUAX's 7.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWSAX Invesco Global Core Equity Fund	8.60%	9.24%	8.01%	2.48%	3.26%	5.38%	15.26%	1.21%	8.57%	5.24%	0.35%	1.22%
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	7.39%	8.09%	2.23%	2.17%	3.55%	2.95%	1.30%	1.52%	2.08%	5.00%	2.04%	6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AWSAX and CSUAX in my portfolio?

AWSAX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AWSAX or CSUAX?

AWSAX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to CSUAX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWSAX dropped -57.00% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.