AWP vs. GRIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) and Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I (GRIFX).
AWP is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on Feb 13, 2007. GRIFX is an actively managed fund by Apollo. It was launched on Jun 30, 2014.
Performance
AWP vs. GRIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AWP vs. GRIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | -1.11% | 12.43% | 12.23% | 12.58% | -37.13% | 40.41% | -10.29% | 42.52% | -18.47% | 44.91% |
GRIFX Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I | 1.48% | 1.14% | 3.78% | -3.05% | -1.17% | 22.08% | -2.69% | 8.38% | 4.97% | 6.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWP achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than GRIFX's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, AWP has outperformed GRIFX with an annualized return of 6.45%, while GRIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.44% annualized return.
AWP
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -11.08%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
GRIFX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 1.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AWP vs. GRIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWP has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GRIFX's 2.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AWP vs. GRIFX — Risk / Return Rank
AWP
GRIFX
AWP vs. GRIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) and Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I (GRIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWP | GRIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 0.64 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 0.93 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 0.74 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | 3.24 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWP | GRIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.64 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.68 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.96 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 1.01 | -0.96 |
Correlation
The correlation between AWP and GRIFX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AWP vs. GRIFX - Dividend Comparison
AWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.03%, more than GRIFX's 5.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | 13.03% | 12.50% | 12.44% | 12.37% | 12.31% | 7.02% | 9.13% | 8.49% | 12.05% | 8.90% | 11.70% | 10.40% |
GRIFX Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I | 5.30% | 5.37% | 5.27% | 5.46% | 4.14% | 3.67% | 5.26% | 5.27% | 5.29% | 5.22% | 5.27% | 2.62% |
Drawdowns
AWP vs. GRIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWP drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, which is greater than GRIFX's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWP and GRIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWP | GRIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.93% | -14.29% | -71.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.21% | -3.61% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -14.29% | -29.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.95% | -14.29% | -39.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.68% | -4.25% | -7.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.60% | -3.38% | -24.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 0.82% | +2.67% |
Volatility
AWP vs. GRIFX - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Apollo Diversified Real Estate Fund Class I (GRIFX) at 0.83%. This indicates that AWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AWP | GRIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 0.83% | +5.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.62% | 2.47% | +8.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.84% | 4.59% | +14.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 5.56% | +16.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 4.62% | +18.97% |