AWF vs. JEPQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ).

AWF is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 28, 1993. JEPQ is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. It was launched on May 3, 2022.

Performance

AWF vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AWF vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	-3.52%	7.54%	14.30%	18.37%	-4.23%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	-2.87%	15.18%	24.85%	36.28%	-12.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWF achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's -2.87% return.

AWF

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: -1.78%
• YTD: -3.52%
• 6M: -5.90%
• 1Y: 1.90%
• 3Y*: 9.54%
• 5Y*: 4.56%
• 10Y*: 6.15%

JEPQ

• 1D: 3.25%
• 1M: -3.50%
• YTD: -2.87%
• 6M: 1.65%
• 1Y: 19.82%
• 3Y*: 19.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWF vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWF has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

AWF

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund

JEPQ

JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF

Return for Risk

AWF vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWF

AWF Risk / Return Rank: 9
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 9

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWF vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AWF	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	1.07	-0.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	1.64	-1.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.27	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	1.70	-1.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.52	8.45	-7.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AWF vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWF Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWF and JEPQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AWF	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17	1.07	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.82	-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between AWF and JEPQ is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AWF vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

AWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, less than JEPQ's 11.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	7.73%	7.81%	7.47%	7.33%	10.30%	6.48%	6.68%	6.62%	7.97%	6.03%	7.73%	10.28%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	11.10%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AWF vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWF drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWF and JEPQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AWF	JEPQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.54%	-20.07%	-35.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-11.58%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.55%	-5.85%	-1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.35%	-3.55%	-8.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.85%	2.34%	+1.51%

Volatility

AWF vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) is 4.56%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that AWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AWF	JEPQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	6.02%	-1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.85%	10.47%	-4.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.30%	18.52%	-7.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.98%	16.91%	-4.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	16.91%	-1.75%