AWF vs. FIQTX
AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) and FIQTX (Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, AWF returned 3.85%/yr vs 6.31%/yr for FIQTX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AWF charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FIQTX.
Performance
AWF vs. FIQTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWF achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than FIQTX's 6.76% return.
AWF
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- -1.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.85%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
FIQTX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- —
AWF vs. FIQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | -1.22% | 7.54% | 14.30% | 18.37% | -16.62% | 9.95% | 4.40% | 23.40% | -7.50% |
FIQTX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z | 6.76% | 12.17% | 10.38% | 12.37% | -11.16% | 11.13% | 9.06% | 17.93% | -6.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWF and FIQTX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.53 |
The correlation between AWF and FIQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWF vs. FIQTX — Risk / Return Rank
AWF
FIQTX
AWF vs. FIQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z (FIQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWF | FIQTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.39 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 4.07 | -4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 15.81 | -16.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWF vs. FIQTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWF drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than FIQTX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWF and FIQTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWF | FIQTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.54% | -28.49% | -27.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -3.12% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.12% | -6.96% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -15.16% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.34% | -1.14% | -4.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -3.27% | -9.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 0.80% | +3.81% |
Volatility
AWF vs. FIQTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) is 2.12%, while Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z (FIQTX) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that AWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWF | FIQTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 2.71% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | 5.16% | +2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.87% | 6.16% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 6.52% | +5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 8.37% | +6.81% |
AWF vs. FIQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWF has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQTX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWF vs. FIQTX - Dividend Comparison
AWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than FIQTX's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund | 7.74% | 7.81% | 7.47% | 7.33% | 10.30% | 6.48% | 6.68% | 6.62% | 7.97% | 6.03% | 7.73% | 10.28% |
FIQTX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z | 4.50% | 4.83% | 5.06% | 4.79% | 7.43% | 5.01% | 3.80% | 4.61% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWF and FIQTX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIQTX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to AWF (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWF dropped -55.54% vs FIQTX's -28.49%.
FIQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWF and FIQTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer