AWF vs. CHCLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) and CHCLX (AB Discovery Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - AWF is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while CHCLX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, AWF returned 5.81%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for CHCLX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AWF charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for CHCLX.

Performance

AWF vs. CHCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWF achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than CHCLX's 15.63% return. Over the past 10 years, AWF has underperformed CHCLX with an annualized return of 5.81%, while CHCLX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.

AWF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 6M: -1.84%
• 1Y: 1.42%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: 5.81%

CHCLX

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 15.63%
• 6M: 16.50%
• 1Y: 30.32%
• 3Y*: 16.51%
• 5Y*: 4.36%
• 10Y*: 13.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWF vs. CHCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	-1.70%	7.54%	14.30%	18.37%	-16.62%	9.95%	4.40%	23.40%	-11.35%	7.77%
CHCLX AB Discovery Growth Fund	15.63%	6.67%	17.37%	18.72%	-36.11%	11.63%	52.90%	39.99%	-4.56%	32.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AWF and CHCLX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1993	0.30

The correlation between AWF and CHCLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AWF vs. CHCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWF

AWF Risk / Return Rank: 3
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CHCLX

CHCLX Risk / Return Rank: 26
CHCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CHCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CHCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CHCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CHCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWF vs. CHCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) and AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AWF	CHCLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	1.42	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	1.96	-1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.25	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	2.03	-1.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	7.59	-7.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AWF vs. CHCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWF Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the CHCLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWF and CHCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AWF	CHCLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	1.42	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.17	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.54	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.38	-0.08

Drawdowns

AWF vs. CHCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWF drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, smaller than the maximum CHCLX drawdown of -63.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWF and CHCLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AWF	CHCLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.54%	-63.85%	+8.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-15.70%	+5.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.12%	-30.36%	+19.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.25%	-44.63%	+19.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.12%	-44.63%	+4.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.81%	-0.53%	-5.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.31%	-14.19%	+1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	4.19%	+0.07%

Volatility

AWF vs. CHCLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) is 3.53%, while AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that AWF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AWF	CHCLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	7.02%	-3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.25%	18.30%	-11.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.70%	22.52%	-13.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.11%	25.74%	-13.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	24.97%	-9.75%

AWF vs. CHCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWF has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CHCLX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

AWF vs. CHCLX - Dividend Comparison

AWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, less than CHCLX's 10.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	7.68%	7.81%	7.47%	7.33%	10.30%	6.48%	6.68%	6.62%	7.97%	6.03%	7.73%	10.28%
CHCLX AB Discovery Growth Fund	10.03%	11.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	17.54%	15.15%	13.36%	20.33%	6.74%	0.00%	6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AWF and CHCLX in my portfolio?

AWF and CHCLX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AWF or CHCLX?

CHCLX has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to AWF (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWF dropped -55.54% vs CHCLX's -63.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.