PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWAYX vs. GQRPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWAYX vs. GQRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWAYX achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than GQRPX's 5.53% return.


AWAYX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
10.03%
6M
9.24%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
12.39%

GQRPX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.58%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWAYX vs. GQRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AWAYX
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy
10.03%21.59%19.08%21.06%-18.42%20.57%13.04%12.83%
GQRPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund
5.53%0.67%19.98%19.56%-3.77%16.94%14.55%12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between AWAYX and GQRPX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between AWAYX and GQRPX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWAYX vs. GQRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWAYX
AWAYX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AWAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
AWAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRPX
GQRPX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GQRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWAYX vs. GQRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AWAYXGQRPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.10

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

0.73

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

1.80

+8.56

AWAYX vs. GQRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWAYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the GQRPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWAYX and GQRPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AWAYX vs. GQRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWAYX drawdown since its inception was -60.32%, which is greater than GQRPX's maximum drawdown of -28.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAYX and GQRPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWAYXGQRPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.32%

-28.88%

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-7.02%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.59%

-16.49%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-20.39%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-5.37%

+3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-4.96%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.85%

-0.54%

Volatility

AWAYX vs. GQRPX - Volatility Comparison

AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) at 3.45%. This indicates that AWAYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWAYXGQRPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

3.45%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

7.33%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

9.41%

+4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

14.73%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

17.23%

-0.43%

AWAYX vs. GQRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWAYX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GQRPX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWAYX vs. GQRPX - Dividend Comparison

AWAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, less than GQRPX's 7.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWAYX
AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy
6.69%7.36%5.97%2.54%7.90%9.02%3.05%4.11%3.94%7.73%6.17%1.87%
GQRPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund
7.20%7.60%6.35%1.22%2.93%1.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AWAYX and GQRPX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWAYX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to GQRPX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAYX dropped -60.32% vs GQRPX's -28.88%.

AWAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWAYX and GQRPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer