AWAY vs. XRT
AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index while XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AWAY returned -5.64%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for XRT. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AWAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.
Performance
AWAY vs. XRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWAY achieves a -3.03% return, which is significantly lower than XRT's 7.71% return.
AWAY
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- -6.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.29%
XRT
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 15.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $667.86K | $330.70K | $217.64K | |
| $450.32M | $386.43M | $453.01M |
AWAY vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | -3.03% | -3.36% | 10.44% | 17.94% | -32.25% | -5.91% | 3.47% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 7.71% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 44.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWAY and XRT is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between AWAY and XRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AWAY vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AWAY
XRT
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AWAY
XRT
Technology
AWAY
XRT
Communication Services
AWAY
XRT
Industrials
AWAY
XRT
-
Financial Services
AWAY
XRT
-
Basic Materials
AWAY
-
XRT
-
Consumer Defensive
AWAY
-
XRT
Energy
AWAY
-
XRT
Healthcare
AWAY
-
XRT
Real Estate
AWAY
-
XRT
-
Utilities
AWAY
-
XRT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWAY vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank
AWAY
XRT
AWAY vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWAY | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.14 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 1.17 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 2.65 | -2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWAY vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWAY drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAY and XRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWAY | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -65.81% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.83% | -13.53% | -19.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.83% | -25.62% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.10% | -44.57% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.50% | -5.30% | -36.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.50% | -14.94% | -21.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.45% | 5.97% | +12.48% |
Volatility
AWAY vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) at 6.38%. This indicates that AWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWAY | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 6.38% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.01% | 14.99% | +4.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.17% | 20.82% | +2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 26.88% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 27.19% | +4.45% |
AWAY vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWAY vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison
AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.74% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWAY and XRT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AWAY has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to XRT (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAY dropped -56.57% vs XRT's -65.81%.
On 5-year performance, XRT leads with 0.80% vs -5.64% for AWAY. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 6.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XRT has performed better with a 0.80% return vs -5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.
XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.
AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AWAY and 0.35% for XRT.
XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWAY and XRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer