AWAY vs. RTH
AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) and RTH (VanEck Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index while RTH tracks the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AWAY returned -5.64%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for RTH. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AWAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.
Performance
AWAY vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWAY achieves a -3.03% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 9.25% return.
AWAY
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- -6.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.29%
RTH
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 14.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $667.86K | $330.70K | $217.64K | |
| $1.31M | $1.19M | $1.27M |
AWAY vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | -3.03% | -3.36% | 10.44% | 17.94% | -32.25% | -5.91% | 3.47% |
RTH VanEck Retail ETF | 9.25% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 25.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWAY and RTH is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between AWAY and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AWAY vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AWAY
RTH
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AWAY
RTH
Technology
AWAY
RTH
-
Communication Services
AWAY
RTH
-
Industrials
AWAY
RTH
Financial Services
AWAY
RTH
-
Basic Materials
AWAY
-
RTH
-
Consumer Defensive
AWAY
-
RTH
Energy
AWAY
-
RTH
-
Healthcare
AWAY
-
RTH
Real Estate
AWAY
-
RTH
-
Utilities
AWAY
-
RTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWAY vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
AWAY
RTH
AWAY vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and VanEck Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AWAY | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.19 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 1.82 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 5.03 | -5.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AWAY vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWAY drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAY and RTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWAY | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -42.32% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.83% | -7.83% | -25.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.83% | -13.80% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.10% | -25.00% | -24.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.50% | 0.00% | -41.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.50% | -7.32% | -29.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.45% | 2.83% | +15.62% |
Volatility
AWAY vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to VanEck Retail ETF (RTH) at 5.07%. This indicates that AWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWAY | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 5.07% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.01% | 10.49% | +8.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.17% | 13.28% | +9.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 16.97% | +9.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.64% | 17.63% | +14.01% |
AWAY vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWAY vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RTH VanEck Retail ETF | 0.89% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWAY and RTH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AWAY has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to RTH (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAY dropped -56.57% vs RTH's -42.32%.
On 5-year performance, RTH leads with 10.03% vs -5.64% for AWAY. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RTH has performed better with a 10.03% return vs -5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.
RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.
AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index, while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AWAY and 0.35% for RTH.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWAY and RTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer