AW1C.DE vs. UIQ4.DE
AW1C.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and UIQ4.DE (UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AW1C.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® ESG Elite, while UIQ4.DE is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Euro Equity Defensive Put Write Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AW1C.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for UIQ4.DE.
Performance
AW1C.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AW1C.DE achieves a 21.11% return, which is significantly higher than UIQ4.DE's 3.01% return.
AW1C.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 22.20%
- 1Y
- 39.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- —
UIQ4.DE
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 3.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AW1C.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.11% | 13.49% |
UIQ4.DE UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 3.01% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between AW1C.DE and UIQ4.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AW1C.DE vs. UIQ4.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AW1C.DE
UIQ4.DE
AW1C.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AW1C.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AW1C.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.27 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
AW1C.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AW1C.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.40%, which is greater than UIQ4.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AW1C.DE and UIQ4.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AW1C.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.40% | -3.90% | -18.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.25% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -0.87% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | — | — |
Volatility
AW1C.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AW1C.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.24% | 7.67% | +17.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 7.67% | +10.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 7.67% | +10.44% |
AW1C.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AW1C.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UIQ4.DE's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AW1C.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AW1C.DE nor UIQ4.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AW1C.DE and UIQ4.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AW1C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for UIQ4.DE.
AW1C.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while UIQ4.DE is Derivative Income. AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite, while UIQ4.DE tracks Euro Equity Defensive Put Write Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AW1C.DE and 0.21% for UIQ4.DE.
Find the right allocation for AW1C.DE and UIQ4.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer