AVXC vs. FEMR
AVXC (Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF) and FEMR (Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVXC returned 62.37% vs 64.21% for FEMR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVXC charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FEMR.
Performance
AVXC vs. FEMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AVXC having a 34.06% return and FEMR slightly higher at 34.71%.
AVXC
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 10.62%
- YTD
- 34.06%
- 6M
- 38.17%
- 1Y
- 62.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEMR
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 34.71%
- 6M
- 39.19%
- 1Y
- 64.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVXC vs. FEMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF | 34.06% | 31.45% | -2.53% |
FEMR Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF | 34.71% | 35.27% | -1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVXC and FEMR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between AVXC and FEMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVXC vs. FEMR — Risk / Return Rank
AVXC
FEMR
AVXC vs. FEMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVXC | FEMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.56 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 4.46 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.06 | 17.85 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVXC | FEMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12 | 3.05 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 2.22 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
AVXC vs. FEMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than FEMR's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and FEMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVXC | FEMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.44% | -15.58% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.04% | -14.47% | +0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -0.41% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -2.31% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 3.61% | -0.15% |
Volatility
AVXC vs. FEMR - Volatility Comparison
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) have volatilities of 9.00% and 8.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVXC | FEMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 8.63% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | 18.52% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 21.17% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 21.28% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 21.28% | -2.81% |
AVXC vs. FEMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMR's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVXC vs. FEMR - Dividend Comparison
AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than FEMR's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF | 1.49% | 1.97% | 1.34% |
FEMR Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF | 1.39% | 1.92% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVXC and FEMR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVXC has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to FEMR (8.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs FEMR's -15.58%.
On 1-year performance, FEMR leads with 64.21% vs 62.37% for AVXC. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, FEMR has been the lower-risk option at 8.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEMR has performed better with a 64.21% return vs 62.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FEMR.
AVXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.39% for FEMR.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVXC and 0.38% for FEMR.
AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVXC and FEMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer