PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVXC vs. EMEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVXC vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVXC achieves a 31.52% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 77.86% return.


AVXC

1D
-5.67%
1M
3.81%
YTD
31.52%
6M
32.82%
1Y
56.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMEQ

1D
-8.46%
1M
12.67%
YTD
77.86%
6M
84.70%
1Y
148.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVXC vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
31.52%31.45%-5.18%
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
77.86%69.78%-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AVXC and EMEQ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.83

The correlation between AVXC and EMEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVXC vs. EMEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVXC
EMEQ

Technology

34.2%
1.1%

Financial Services

18.9%
6.8%

Industrials

8.7%
0.3%

Basic Materials

7.3%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
6.2%

Energy

3.7%
1.3%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
3.8%

Utilities

2.4%
0.9%

Healthcare

2.1%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Technology

AVXC
34.2%
EMEQ
1.1%

Financial Services

AVXC
18.9%
EMEQ
6.8%

Industrials

AVXC
8.7%
EMEQ
0.3%

Basic Materials

AVXC
7.3%
EMEQ
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AVXC
5.4%
EMEQ
6.2%

Energy

AVXC
3.7%
EMEQ
1.3%

Communication Services

AVXC
3.5%
EMEQ
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

AVXC
2.7%
EMEQ
3.8%

Utilities

AVXC
2.4%
EMEQ
0.9%

Healthcare

AVXC
2.1%
EMEQ
1.4%

Real Estate

AVXC
1.3%
EMEQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVXC vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVXC vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVXCEMEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.61

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

8.31

-4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.56

30.81

-15.26

AVXC vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVXC and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVXC vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, roughly equal to the maximum EMEQ drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and EMEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVXCEMEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-19.99%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-17.91%

+3.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-8.46%

+2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-4.03%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

4.82%

-1.20%

Volatility

AVXC vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) is 13.12%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 21.89%. This indicates that AVXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVXCEMEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.12%

21.89%

-8.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.15%

34.54%

-13.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

37.38%

-14.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.83%

32.96%

-13.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.83%

32.96%

-13.13%

AVXC vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVXC vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than EMEQ's 1.55% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVXC and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMEQ has higher volatility (21.89%) compared to AVXC (13.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 148.00% vs 56.20% for AVXC. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AVXC has been the lower-risk option at 13.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 148.00% return vs 56.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

AVXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.55% for EMEQ.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVXC and 0.86% for EMEQ.

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVXC and EMEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer