PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVXC vs. DEXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVXC vs. DEXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVXC achieves a 31.52% return, which is significantly lower than DEXC's 33.63% return.


AVXC

1D
-5.67%
1M
3.81%
YTD
31.52%
6M
32.82%
1Y
56.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DEXC

1D
-6.22%
1M
3.82%
YTD
33.63%
6M
34.97%
1Y
55.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVXC vs. DEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVXC and DEXC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2024

0.98

The correlation between AVXC and DEXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVXC vs. DEXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVXC
DEXC

Technology

34.2%
48.0%

Financial Services

18.9%
14.3%

Industrials

8.7%
9.6%

Basic Materials

7.3%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
5.8%

Energy

3.7%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
3.1%

Utilities

2.4%
1.9%

Healthcare

2.1%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.4%

Technology

AVXC
34.2%
DEXC
48.0%

Financial Services

AVXC
18.9%
DEXC
14.3%

Industrials

AVXC
8.7%
DEXC
9.6%

Basic Materials

AVXC
7.3%
DEXC
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

AVXC
5.4%
DEXC
5.8%

Energy

AVXC
3.7%
DEXC
3.3%

Communication Services

AVXC
3.5%
DEXC
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

AVXC
2.7%
DEXC
3.1%

Utilities

AVXC
2.4%
DEXC
1.9%

Healthcare

AVXC
2.1%
DEXC
2.6%

Real Estate

AVXC
1.3%
DEXC
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVXC vs. DEXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DEXC
DEXC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DEXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DEXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVXC vs. DEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVXCDEXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

4.36

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.56

16.49

-0.93

AVXC vs. DEXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the DEXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVXC and DEXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVXC vs. DEXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than DEXC's maximum drawdown of -15.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and DEXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVXCDEXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-15.07%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-12.86%

-1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-6.22%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-2.45%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

3.39%

+0.23%

Volatility

AVXC vs. DEXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) is 13.12%, while Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) has a volatility of 13.89%. This indicates that AVXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVXCDEXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.12%

13.89%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.15%

22.10%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

23.74%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.83%

21.74%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.83%

21.74%

-1.91%

AVXC vs. DEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than DEXC's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVXC vs. DEXC - Dividend Comparison

AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than DEXC's 1.97% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, AVXC and DEXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DEXC has higher volatility (13.89%) compared to AVXC (13.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs DEXC's -15.07%.

On 1-year performance, AVXC leads with 56.20% vs 55.75% for DEXC. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AVXC has been the lower-risk option at 13.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVXC has performed better with a 56.20% return vs 55.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DEXC.

AVXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.97% for DEXC.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVXC and 0.43% for DEXC.

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVXC and DEXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer