AVUV vs. XMMO
AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. AVUV is actively managed, while XMMO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUV returned 10.85%/yr vs 15.72%/yr for XMMO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
AVUV vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AVUV having a 18.87% return and XMMO slightly higher at 19.66%.
AVUV
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 36.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 31.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.50%
AVUV vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 18.87% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 19.66% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 4.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUV and XMMO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between AVUV and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AVUV vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUV
XMMO
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
AVUV
XMMO
Energy
AVUV
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
AVUV
XMMO
Industrials
AVUV
XMMO
Technology
AVUV
XMMO
Basic Materials
AVUV
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
AVUV
XMMO
Healthcare
AVUV
XMMO
Communication Services
AVUV
XMMO
Real Estate
AVUV
XMMO
Utilities
AVUV
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUV vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
AVUV
XMMO
AVUV vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 3.75 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 15.23 | -1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 1.63 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.73 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
AVUV vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -55.37% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -8.34% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.79% | -24.93% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -27.91% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -3.69% | +3.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -9.45% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.07% | +0.60% |
Volatility
AVUV vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 4.29%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 7.70% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 16.07% | -4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 19.18% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 21.52% | +1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.29% | 22.31% | +5.98% |
AVUV vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVUV vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than XMMO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.62% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUV and XMMO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to AVUV (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 15.72% vs 10.85% for AVUV. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 15.72% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.
AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.35% for XMMO.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUV and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer