AVUV vs. XJR
AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while XJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. AVUV is actively managed, while XJR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUV returned 10.85%/yr vs 5.18%/yr for XJR. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XJR.
Performance
AVUV vs. XJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than XJR's 15.29% return.
AVUV
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 36.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
XJR
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 27.56%
- 3Y*
- 13.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.18%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUV vs. XJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 18.87% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 37.26% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 15.29% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -17.30% | 24.96% | 35.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUV and XJR is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between AVUV and XJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVUV vs. XJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUV
XJR
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
AVUV
XJR
Energy
AVUV
XJR
Consumer Cyclical
AVUV
XJR
Industrials
AVUV
XJR
Technology
AVUV
XJR
Basic Materials
AVUV
XJR
Consumer Defensive
AVUV
XJR
Healthcare
AVUV
XJR
Communication Services
AVUV
XJR
Real Estate
AVUV
XJR
Utilities
AVUV
XJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUV vs. XJR — Risk / Return Rank
AVUV
XJR
AVUV vs. XJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUV | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.27 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 2.93 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 9.42 | +4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUV | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 1.55 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.24 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.67 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
AVUV vs. XJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, which is greater than XJR's maximum drawdown of -27.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and XJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUV | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -27.14% | -22.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -9.43% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.79% | -27.14% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -27.14% | -1.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.08% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -9.46% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.93% | -0.26% |
Volatility
AVUV vs. XJR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 4.29%, while iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUV | XJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 5.06% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 12.41% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 17.95% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 21.45% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.29% | 21.73% | +6.56% |
AVUV vs. XJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XJR's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVUV vs. XJR - Dividend Comparison
AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than XJR's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, AVUV and XJR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XJR has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to AVUV (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs XJR's -27.14%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.85% vs 5.18% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.85% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.99% for XJR.
AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.12% for XJR.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUV and XJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer