AVUV vs. URA
AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. AVUV is actively managed, while URA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUV returned 11.22%/yr vs 18.04%/yr for URA. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
AVUV vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 19.43% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 3.25% return.
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 6M
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -20.04%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 6M
- -3.95%
- 1Y
- 31.40%
- 3Y*
- 32.02%
- 5Y*
- 18.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
AVUV vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 19.43% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 3.25% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | 0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUV and URA is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.49 |
The correlation between AVUV and URA shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AVUV vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUV
URA
Financial Services
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Financial Services
AVUV
URA
-
Energy
AVUV
URA
Consumer Cyclical
AVUV
URA
-
Industrials
AVUV
URA
Technology
AVUV
URA
Basic Materials
AVUV
URA
Consumer Defensive
AVUV
URA
-
Healthcare
AVUV
URA
-
Communication Services
AVUV
URA
-
Real Estate
AVUV
URA
-
Utilities
AVUV
URA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUV vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
AVUV
URA
AVUV vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUV | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.14 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | 1.10 | +3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.68 | 2.29 | +11.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUV | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 0.62 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.41 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | -0.07 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
AVUV vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUV | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -93.54% | +44.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -28.62% | +20.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.79% | -37.81% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -37.90% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -49.93% | +49.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -74.96% | +67.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 13.77% | -11.10% |
Volatility
AVUV vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 4.29%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.09%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUV | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 17.09% | -12.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 39.31% | -27.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 51.30% | -33.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 43.86% | -21.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 37.86% | -9.59% |
AVUV vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVUV vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than URA's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.65% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.72% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUV and URA have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (17.09%) compared to AVUV (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs URA's -93.54%.
On 5-year performance, URA leads with 18.04% vs 11.22% for AVUV. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, URA has performed better with a 18.04% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.65% for AVUV.
AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.69% for URA.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUV and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer