AVUV vs. RWK
AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while RWK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. AVUV is actively managed, while RWK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUV returned 10.85%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for RWK. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RWK.
Performance
AVUV vs. RWK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than RWK's 12.60% return.
AVUV
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 36.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
RWK
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 12.51%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
AVUV vs. RWK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 18.87% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 12.60% | 10.27% | 11.94% | 23.76% | -8.19% | 34.31% | 11.06% | 10.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUV and RWK is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between AVUV and RWK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVUV vs. RWK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUV
RWK
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
AVUV
RWK
Energy
AVUV
RWK
Consumer Cyclical
AVUV
RWK
Industrials
AVUV
RWK
Technology
AVUV
RWK
Basic Materials
AVUV
RWK
Consumer Defensive
AVUV
RWK
Healthcare
AVUV
RWK
Communication Services
AVUV
RWK
Real Estate
AVUV
RWK
Utilities
AVUV
RWK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUV vs. RWK — Risk / Return Rank
AVUV
RWK
AVUV vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUV | RWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 2.39 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 7.67 | +6.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUV | RWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 1.60 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.50 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.48 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
AVUV vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum RWK drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and RWK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUV | RWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -56.49% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -11.14% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.79% | -24.58% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -24.58% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.99% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -7.55% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.46% | -0.79% |
Volatility
AVUV vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) at 4.08%. This indicates that AVUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUV | RWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 4.08% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 11.88% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 16.67% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 21.13% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.29% | 22.95% | +5.34% |
AVUV vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RWK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVUV vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison
AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than RWK's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 1.13% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUV and RWK have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVUV has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to RWK (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs RWK's -56.49%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.85% vs 10.58% for RWK. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RWK has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.85% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.13% for RWK.
AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while RWK is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.39% for RWK.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUV and RWK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer