AVUV vs. QGRO
AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR). AVUV is actively managed, while QGRO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUV returned 10.85%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for QGRO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QGRO.
Performance
AVUV vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than QGRO's 0.09% return.
AVUV
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 36.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUV vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 18.87% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.09% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUV and QGRO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between AVUV and QGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVUV vs. QGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUV
QGRO
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
AVUV
QGRO
Energy
AVUV
QGRO
Consumer Cyclical
AVUV
QGRO
Industrials
AVUV
QGRO
Technology
AVUV
QGRO
Basic Materials
AVUV
QGRO
Consumer Defensive
AVUV
QGRO
Healthcare
AVUV
QGRO
Communication Services
AVUV
QGRO
Real Estate
AVUV
QGRO
Utilities
AVUV
QGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUV vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank
AVUV
QGRO
AVUV vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUV | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.09 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 0.53 | +4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 1.78 | +12.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUV | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 0.46 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.56 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.65 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
AVUV vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, which is greater than QGRO's maximum drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and QGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUV | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -32.56% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -13.54% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.79% | -23.82% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -31.86% | +3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -2.71% | +2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -7.67% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 4.04% | -1.37% |
Volatility
AVUV vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) have volatilities of 4.29% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUV | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 4.33% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 12.03% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 15.58% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 21.09% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.29% | 22.93% | +5.36% |
AVUV vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRO's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVUV vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison
AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than QGRO's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.20% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUV and QGRO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to AVUV (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs QGRO's -32.56%.
On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 11.72% vs 10.85% for AVUV. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.20% for QGRO.
AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while QGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.29% for QGRO.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUV and QGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer