AVUV vs. DFIV

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVUV returned 17.14%/yr vs 21.75%/yr for DFIV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.

Performance

AVUV vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 22.92% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 12.67% return.

AVUV

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 2.11%
• 6M: 15.52%
• YTD: 22.92%
• 1Y: 34.78%
• 3Y*: 17.14%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.12%

DFIV

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 1.43%
• 6M: 9.00%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 1Y: 33.17%
• 3Y*: 21.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUV vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF	22.92%	7.44%	9.28%	22.82%	-4.91%	8.74%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	12.67%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUV and DFIV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021	0.72

The correlation between AVUV and DFIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AVUV vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVUV	DFIV
Financial Services	27.8%	34.3%
Consumer Cyclical	18.5%	9.7%
Energy	13.9%	14.1%
Industrials	13.5%	9.8%
Technology	7.4%	3.1%
Healthcare	5.3%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.2%
Basic Materials	4.8%	10.5%
Communication Services	2.9%	4.0%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.7%
Utilities	0.2%	2.3%

Return for Risk

AVUV vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUV

AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 86
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 88
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUV vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVUV	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.37	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	3.27	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.42	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.39	3.45	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.09	13.11	-0.02

AVUV vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUV and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVUV vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVUV	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.42%	-25.42%	-24.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.95%	-9.66%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.79%	-14.72%	-14.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-1.51%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-4.40%	-3.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	2.54%	+0.12%

Volatility

AVUV vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 2.66%, while Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVUV	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	3.26%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.10%	11.63%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.14%	14.09%	+3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.45%	16.56%	+5.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.08%	16.56%	+11.52%

AVUV vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVUV vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than DFIV's 2.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF	1.25%	1.58%	1.61%	1.65%	1.74%	1.28%	1.21%	0.38%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.67%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVUV and DFIV in my portfolio?

AVUV and DFIV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVUV or DFIV?

DFIV has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to AVUV (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, AVUV or DFIV?

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 21.75% vs 17.14% for AVUV. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVUV or DFIV?

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 21.75% return vs 17.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVUV or DFIV?

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVUV or DFIV?

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.25% for AVUV.

What is the main difference between AVUV and DFIV?

AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.27% for DFIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.