PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVUV vs. BTGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVUV vs. BTGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than BTGD's -32.80% return.


AVUV

1D
1.01%
1M
0.89%
YTD
18.87%
6M
18.74%
1Y
36.82%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*

BTGD

1D
5.44%
1M
-28.40%
YTD
-32.80%
6M
-33.78%
1Y
-31.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUV vs. BTGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
18.87%7.44%-1.75%
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
-32.80%34.62%29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUV and BTGD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVUV vs. BTGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BTGD
BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUV vs. BTGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVUVBTGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.93

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

-0.60

+5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

-1.29

+15.10

AVUV vs. BTGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the BTGD Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUV and BTGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVUVBTGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

-0.57

+2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.19

+0.38

Drawdowns

AVUV vs. BTGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum BTGD drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and BTGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVUVBTGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.42%

-53.31%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-53.31%

+45.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-50.77%

+50.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-14.85%

+6.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

24.72%

-22.05%

Volatility

AVUV vs. BTGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 4.29%, while STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVUVBTGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

14.85%

-10.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

46.45%

-35.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

56.04%

-38.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.75%

55.94%

-33.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.29%

55.94%

-27.65%

AVUV vs. BTGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTGD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVUV vs. BTGD - Dividend Comparison

AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than BTGD's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.28%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
5.00%3.36%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVUV and BTGD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTGD has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to AVUV (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs BTGD's -53.31%.

On 1-year performance, AVUV leads with 36.82% vs -31.91% for BTGD. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 36.82% return vs -31.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.

BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 1.28% for AVUV.

AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BTGD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Quantify Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 1.00% for BTGD.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVUV and BTGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer