AVUS vs. AVNM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) and AVNM (Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while AVNM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVUS returned 32.34% vs 35.92% for AVNM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for AVNM.

Performance

AVUS vs. AVNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AVUS having a 14.42% return and AVNM slightly higher at 14.81%.

AVUS

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 14.42%
• 6M: 14.71%
• 1Y: 32.34%
• 3Y*: 22.35%
• 5Y*: 13.04%
• 10Y*: —

AVNM

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 6M: 17.96%
• 1Y: 35.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUS vs. AVNM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF	14.42%	16.68%	20.43%	10.34%
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	14.81%	38.30%	5.52%	8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUS and AVNM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.75

The correlation between AVUS and AVNM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVUS vs. AVNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVUS	AVNM
Technology	27.5%	12.5%
Financial Services	15.2%	23.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	10.0%
Industrials	11.5%	17.1%
Communication Services	9.8%	4.3%
Energy	7.4%	8.3%
Healthcare	7.1%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	3.9%
Basic Materials	2.7%	11.7%
Utilities	2.5%	2.9%
Real Estate	0.2%	1.7%

Return for Risk

AVUS vs. AVNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUS

AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 81
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

AVNM

AVNM Risk / Return Rank: 69
AVNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AVNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AVNM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
AVNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AVNM Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUS vs. AVNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVUS	AVNM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	2.44	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	3.26	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.44	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.14	3.11	+1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.85	12.16	+6.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVUS vs. AVNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the AVNM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUS and AVNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVUS	AVNM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	2.44	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	1.54	-0.74

Drawdowns

AVUS vs. AVNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than AVNM's maximum drawdown of -14.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and AVNM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVUS	AVNM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.04%	-14.03%	-23.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.85%	-11.59%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-1.14%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-2.55%	-2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	2.96%	-1.24%

Volatility

AVUS vs. AVNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) is 2.98%, while Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that AVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVUS	AVNM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.98%	5.19%	-2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	12.59%	-3.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.15%	14.82%	-2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	14.86%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.85%	14.86%	+5.99%

AVUS vs. AVNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVNM's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVUS vs. AVNM - Dividend Comparison

AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than AVNM's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	2.51%	2.76%	3.51%	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF	0.91%	1.08%	1.27%	1.41%	1.59%	1.08%	1.19%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVUS and AVNM in my portfolio?

AVUS and AVNM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVUS or AVNM?

AVNM has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to AVUS (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs AVNM's -14.03%.

Which ETF is better, AVUS or AVNM?

On 1-year performance, AVNM leads with 35.92% vs 32.34% for AVUS. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVUS or AVNM?

Over the 1-year period, AVNM has performed better with a 35.92% return vs 32.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVUS or AVNM?

AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for AVNM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVUS or AVNM?

AVNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.91% for AVUS.

What is the main difference between AVUS and AVNM?

AVUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AVNM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUS and 0.31% for AVNM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.