AVTM vs. WLDR
AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) and WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AVTM is actively managed, while WLDR is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVTM charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for WLDR.
Performance
AVTM vs. WLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVTM
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WLDR
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 11.85%
- YTD
- 29.55%
- 6M
- 34.62%
- 1Y
- 57.12%
- 3Y*
- 32.72%
- 5Y*
- 18.09%
- 10Y*
- —
AVTM vs. WLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 9.06% |
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 20.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVTM and WLDR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.80 |
AVTM vs. WLDR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVTM
WLDR
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVTM
WLDR
Financial Services
AVTM
WLDR
Industrials
AVTM
WLDR
Consumer Cyclical
AVTM
WLDR
Communication Services
AVTM
WLDR
Healthcare
AVTM
WLDR
Energy
AVTM
WLDR
Consumer Defensive
AVTM
WLDR
Basic Materials
AVTM
WLDR
Utilities
AVTM
WLDR
Real Estate
AVTM
WLDR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVTM vs. WLDR — Risk / Return Rank
AVTM
WLDR
AVTM vs. WLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVTM | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.88 | 0.60 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
AVTM vs. WLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVTM drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum WLDR drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVTM and WLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVTM | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -44.69% | +35.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -1.46% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -8.63% | +6.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.18% | — |
Volatility
AVTM vs. WLDR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVTM | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.88% | 15.00% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 17.22% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 20.94% | -5.06% |
AVTM vs. WLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVTM has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDR's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVTM vs. WLDR - Dividend Comparison
AVTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than WLDR's 7.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 7.05% | 9.01% | 13.99% | 2.28% | 2.10% | 7.55% | 1.80% | 2.48% | 2.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVTM and WLDR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVTM is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVTM is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.
WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.05%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Regents Park Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AVTM and 0.67% for WLDR.
Find the right allocation for AVTM and WLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer