AVTM vs. FWD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVTM charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

AVTM vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AVTM

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FWD

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 3.15%
• YTD: 35.20%
• 6M: 32.48%
• 1Y: 62.07%
• 3Y*: 37.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVTM vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF	7.18%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	25.20%

Correlation

The correlation between AVTM and FWD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026	0.86

AVTM vs. FWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVTM	FWD
Technology	33.8%	59.8%
Financial Services	15.7%	0.5%
Industrials	11.6%	19.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	3.6%
Communication Services	9.9%	3.4%
Healthcare	6.5%	6.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	0.8%
Energy	3.7%	2.6%
Basic Materials	2.6%	1.9%
Utilities	1.6%	0.3%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.7%

Return for Risk

AVTM vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVTM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 81
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVTM vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVTM	FWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.87	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.19	—

Drawdowns

AVTM vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVTM drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVTM and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVTM	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.21%	-29.02%	+19.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	-5.16%	+2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-4.06%	+2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AVTM	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.80%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.42%	26.73%	-10.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.42%	25.37%	-8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.42%	25.37%	-8.95%

AVTM vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVTM has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVTM vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

AVTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.08%	0.11%	1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVTM and FWD in my portfolio?

AVTM and FWD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AVTM or FWD?

On fees, AVTM is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVTM or FWD?

AVTM is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVTM or FWD?

AVTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.

What is the main difference between AVTM and FWD?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AVTM and 0.65% for FWD.