AVTM vs. CAOS
AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVTM is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Their -0.48 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AVTM charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
AVTM vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVTM
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CAOS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.72K | $334.14K | $211.16K | |
| $6.81M | $5.39M | $5.09M |
AVTM vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 8.35% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVTM and CAOS is -0.48, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVTM vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
AVTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CAOS
AVTM vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVTM | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVTM vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVTM drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVTM and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVTM | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -3.89% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -1.13% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -0.92% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.34% | — |
Volatility
AVTM vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVTM | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.72% | 1.57% | +14.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 4.18% | +11.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 4.18% | +11.54% |
AVTM vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVTM has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVTM vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
AVTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 0.28% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVTM and CAOS have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVTM is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVTM is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.
AVTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
AVTM is categorized as Global Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AVTM and 0.63% for CAOS.
Find the right allocation for AVTM and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer