AVSU vs. BUFH
AVSU (Avantis Responsible U.S. Equity ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVSU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVSU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
AVSU vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVSU achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.
AVSU
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 6.75%
- YTD
- 14.85%
- 6M
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 33.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVSU vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVSU Avantis Responsible U.S. Equity ETF | 14.85% | 14.05% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVSU and BUFH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVSU vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
AVSU
BUFH
AVSU vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Responsible U.S. Equity ETF (AVSU) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVSU | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVSU | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 2.91 | -2.10 |
Drawdowns
AVSU vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVSU drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVSU and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVSU | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.67% | -1.53% | -20.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.05% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -0.18% | -5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | — | — |
Volatility
AVSU vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVSU | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 2.37% | +11.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 2.37% | +15.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 2.37% | +15.50% |
AVSU vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVSU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVSU vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
AVSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVSU Avantis Responsible U.S. Equity ETF | 0.87% | 1.03% | 1.22% | 1.22% | 0.99% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVSU and BUFH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVSU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVSU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
AVSU has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
AVSU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVSU and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for AVSU and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer