PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVSE vs. XC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVSE vs. XC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVSE achieves a 17.48% return, which is significantly higher than XC's 0.72% return.


AVSE

1D
1.03%
1M
-2.96%
6M
8.96%
YTD
17.48%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.59%

XC

1D
0.62%
1M
1.81%
6M
-4.03%
YTD
0.72%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.09M$1.10M$1.10M
$692.69K$486.37K$573.91K

AVSE vs. XC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AVSE
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF
17.48%32.54%8.29%16.01%4.41%
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
0.72%18.19%5.49%21.31%1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AVSE and XC is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2022

0.83

The correlation between AVSE and XC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVSE vs. XC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVSE
XC

Technology

44.0%
3.5%

Financial Services

22.8%
31.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
12.1%

Industrials

6.7%
10.9%

Communication Services

5.4%
6.3%

Healthcare

3.4%
4.9%

Basic Materials

2.7%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
8.0%

Real Estate

2.2%
4.0%

Utilities

1.1%
3.8%

Energy

0.1%
4.5%

Technology

AVSE
44.0%
XC
3.5%

Financial Services

AVSE
22.8%
XC
31.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AVSE
9.4%
XC
12.1%

Industrials

AVSE
6.7%
XC
10.9%

Communication Services

AVSE
5.4%
XC
6.3%

Healthcare

AVSE
3.4%
XC
4.9%

Basic Materials

AVSE
2.7%
XC
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

AVSE
2.3%
XC
8.0%

Real Estate

AVSE
2.2%
XC
4.0%

Utilities

AVSE
1.1%
XC
3.8%

Energy

AVSE
0.1%
XC
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVSE vs. XC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVSE
AVSE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AVSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

XC
XC Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XC Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XC Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVSE vs. XC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVSEXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.11

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

0.65

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.01

1.57

+5.44

AVSE vs. XC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the XC Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVSE and XC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVSE vs. XC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVSE drawdown since its inception was -26.28%, which is greater than XC's maximum drawdown of -20.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVSE and XC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVSEXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.28%

-20.97%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.82%

-12.47%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-20.97%

+3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.34%

-5.41%

-4.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-4.26%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.72%

5.15%

-0.43%

Volatility

AVSE vs. XC - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) at 4.16%. This indicates that AVSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVSEXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.16%

4.16%

+5.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.85%

13.30%

+8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.98%

15.01%

+8.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.05%

15.83%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

15.83%

+3.22%

AVSE vs. XC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVSE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than XC's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVSE vs. XC - Dividend Comparison

AVSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than XC's 11.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AVSE
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.14%2.68%3.03%3.20%1.27%
XC
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund
11.93%11.74%1.49%1.42%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVSE and XC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVSE has higher volatility (9.16%) compared to XC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVSE dropped -26.28% vs XC's -20.97%.

On 3-year performance, AVSE leads with 20.73% vs 10.34% for XC. On fees, XC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, XC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVSE has performed better with a 20.73% return vs 10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVSE.

XC has the higher dividend yield at 11.93%, compared with 2.14% for AVSE.

AVSE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while XC tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVSE and 0.32% for XC.

AVSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVSE and XC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer